diameter: has quality definition

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents parameter
Weight: 0.67
, length
Weight: 0.65
, size
Weight: 0.65
, factor
Weight: 0.60
Siblings circumference
Weight: 0.54
, width
Weight: 0.37
, inch
Weight: 0.35
, radius
Weight: 0.34
, aperture
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality definition 1.00
is 12 standard 0.77
has quality good 0.76
has quality bad 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(diameter, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(circumference, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(diameter, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(width, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(diameter, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(aperture, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(diameter, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(aperture, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(aperture, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(diameter, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(width, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(width, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(diameter, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(circumference, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(circumference, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(diameter, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(diameter, has quality definition)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(diameter, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(diameter, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(diameter, has quality definition)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(diameter, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(diameter, has quality definition)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(diameter, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(circumference, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(diameter, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(aperture, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(diameter, has quality definition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(width, has quality good)