diamond: be hard than glass

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mineral
Weight: 0.70
, commodity
Weight: 0.63
, material
Weight: 0.62
, jewel
Weight: 0.62
Siblings infield
Weight: 0.41
, quartz
Weight: 0.36
, garnet
Weight: 0.35
, emerald
Weight: 0.35
, tungsten
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be hard than glass 1.00
be used to mould glass 0.89
be hard than plastic 0.87
be used to cut glass 0.85
be hard than steel 0.84
be hard 0.81
be hard than bone 0.81
be used to scratch glass 0.80
be hard than fingernail 0.80
scratch glass 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(mineral, be hard)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(diamond, be hard than glass)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(diamond, be hard than glass)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(mineral, be hard)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(diamond, be hard than glass)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(mineral, be hard)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(diamond, be hard than glass)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(quartz, be used to mould glass)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(mineral, be hard)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(diamond, be hard than glass)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(diamond, be hard than glass)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(diamond, be hard than glass)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(quartz, be used to mould glass)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(quartz, be used to mould glass)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(diamond, be hard than glass)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(diamond, be hard than glass)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(diamond, be hard than glass)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(diamond, be used to cut glass)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(diamond, be hard than glass)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(diamond, be hard than plastic)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(diamond, be hard than glass)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(diamond, be used to cut glass)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(diamond, be hard than glass)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(diamond, be hard than plastic)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(diamond, be hard than glass)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(diamond, be used to scratch glass)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(diamond, be hard than glass)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(diamond, be hard than glass)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(diamond, be hard than glass)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(diamond, be hard than glass)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(diamond, be hard than glass)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(diamond, be hard than glass)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(mineral, be hard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(diamond, be hard than glass)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(quartz, be used to mould glass)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(diamond, be hard than glass)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(mineral, be hard)