diamond: has quality worth

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mineral
Weight: 0.70
, commodity
Weight: 0.63
, material
Weight: 0.62
, jewel
Weight: 0.62
Siblings infield
Weight: 0.41
, quartz
Weight: 0.36
, tourmaline
Weight: 0.36
, garnet
Weight: 0.35
, emerald
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality worth 1.00
has quality good 0.85
is valued 0.77
be valued 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(diamond, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(emerald, has quality worth)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(diamond, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(garnet, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(diamond, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(emerald, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(emerald, has quality worth)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(diamond, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(garnet, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(garnet, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(diamond, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(diamond, has quality worth)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(diamond, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(diamond, has quality good)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(diamond, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(diamond, has quality good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(diamond, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(diamond, is valued)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(diamond, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(diamond, is valued)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(diamond, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(diamond, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(diamond, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(diamond, is valued)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(diamond, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(diamond, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(diamond, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(diamond, is valued)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(diamond, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(diamond, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(diamond, has quality worth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(diamond, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(diamond, has quality worth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(diamond, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(emerald, has quality worth)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(diamond, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(garnet, has quality good)