diaphragm: hurt

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.64
, pump
Weight: 0.61
, tissue
Weight: 0.58
, method
Weight: 0.57
, respiratory system
Weight: 0.56
Siblings endotracheal tube
Weight: 0.35
, salivary gland
Weight: 0.35
, vacuum tube
Weight: 0.35
, nasal cavity
Weight: 0.35
, fallopian tube
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
hurt 1.00
get damaged 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(diaphragm, hurt)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(fallopian tube, get damaged)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(diaphragm, hurt)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(fallopian tube, get damaged)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(fallopian tube, get damaged)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(diaphragm, hurt)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(diaphragm, hurt)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(diaphragm, hurt)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(diaphragm, hurt)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(diaphragm, hurt)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(diaphragm, hurt)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(diaphragm, hurt)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(diaphragm, hurt)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(fallopian tube, get damaged)