diet coke: be at restaurant

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents soft drink
Weight: 0.71
, drink
Weight: 0.69
, diet
Weight: 0.69
, product
Weight: 0.65
Siblings chocolate milk
Weight: 0.36
, coca cola
Weight: 0.36
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.36
, soda
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at fast-food restaurant 1.00
be at restaurant 1.00
be at resturant 0.85
be at bar 0.79
be at store 0.77
be at shop 0.76
be at grocery store 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(product, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(diet coke, be at restaurant)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(product, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(diet coke, be at restaurant)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(drink, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(diet coke, be at restaurant)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(product, be at shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(diet coke, be at restaurant)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(product, be at shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(diet coke, be at restaurant)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(drink, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(diet coke, be at restaurant)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(drink, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(diet coke, be at restaurant)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(diet coke, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(drink, be at restaurant)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(diet coke, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(drink, be at bar)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(diet coke, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(drink, be at bar)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(diet coke, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(product, be at shop)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(diet coke, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(product, be at shop)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(diet coke, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(product, be at store)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(diet coke, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(product, be at store)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(drink, be at restaurant)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(drink, be at bar)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(drink, be at bar)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(product, be at shop)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(product, be at shop)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(product, be at store)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(product, be at store)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(soda, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(soda, be at grocery store)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(alcoholic beverage, be at bar)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(drink, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(diet coke, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(diet coke, be at restaurant)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(drink, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(diet coke, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(diet coke, be at restaurant)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(drink, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(diet coke, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(diet coke, be at restaurant)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(product, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(diet coke, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(diet coke, be at restaurant)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(product, be at store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(diet coke, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(diet coke, be at restaurant)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(product, be at shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(diet coke, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(diet coke, be at restaurant)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(product, be at shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(diet coke, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(diet coke, be at restaurant)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(diet coke, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(soda, be at fast-food restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(soda, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(diet coke, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(alcoholic beverage, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(alcoholic beverage, be at bar)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(diet coke, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(soda, be at grocery store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(soda, be at grocery store)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(diet coke, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(diet coke, be at restaurant)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(diet coke, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(diet coke, be at resturant)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(diet coke, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(diet coke, be at store)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(diet coke, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(diet coke, be at resturant)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(diet coke, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be at resturant)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(diet coke, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(diet coke, be at resturant)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(diet coke, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(diet coke, be at store)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(diet coke, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be at store)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(diet coke, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(diet coke, be at store)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(diet coke, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(diet coke, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be at restaurant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(diet coke, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(diet coke, be at restaurant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(product, be at store)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(product, be at store)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(product, be at shop)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(product, be at shop)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(drink, be at restaurant)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(drink, be at bar)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(drink, be at bar)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(soda, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(alcoholic beverage, be at bar)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(soda, be at grocery store)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(diet coke, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(product, be at store)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(diet coke, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(product, be at store)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(diet coke, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(drink, be at restaurant)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(diet coke, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(product, be at shop)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(diet coke, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(product, be at shop)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(diet coke, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(drink, be at bar)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(diet coke, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(drink, be at bar)