diet coke: be more expensive than coke

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents soft drink
Weight: 0.71
, drink
Weight: 0.69
, diet
Weight: 0.69
, product
Weight: 0.65
Siblings chocolate milk
Weight: 0.36
, coca cola
Weight: 0.36
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.36
, soda
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more expensive than coke 1.00
be better than coke 0.95
be than coke 0.95
be worse than coke 0.93
be more dense than coke 0.93
be less dense than coke 0.93
be lighter than coke 0.92
be than regular coke 0.91
have less mass than regular coke 0.90
weigh less than regular coke 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(diet coke, be more expensive than coke)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(diet coke, be more expensive than coke)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(diet coke, be more expensive than coke)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(diet coke, be than coke)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(diet coke, be more expensive than coke)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(diet coke, be better than coke)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(diet coke, be more expensive than coke)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(diet coke, be more dense than coke)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(diet coke, be more expensive than coke)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(diet coke, be than coke)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(diet coke, be more expensive than coke)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(diet coke, be than coke)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(diet coke, be more expensive than coke)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(diet coke, be less dense than coke)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(diet coke, be more expensive than coke)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(diet coke, be better than coke)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(diet coke, be more expensive than coke)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(diet coke, be more dense than coke)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(diet coke, be more expensive than coke)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(diet coke, be less dense than coke)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(diet coke, be more expensive than coke)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(diet coke, be better than coke)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(diet coke, be more expensive than coke)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(diet coke, be more dense than coke)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(diet coke, be more expensive than coke)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(diet coke, be less dense than coke)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(diet coke, be more expensive than coke)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(diet coke, have less mass than regular coke)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(diet coke, be more expensive than coke)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(diet coke, be worse than coke)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(diet coke, be more expensive than coke)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(diet coke, be lighter than coke)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(diet coke, be more expensive than coke)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(diet coke, be than regular coke)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(diet coke, be more expensive than coke)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, have less mass than regular coke)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(diet coke, be more expensive than coke)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(diet coke, weigh less than regular coke)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(diet coke, be more expensive than coke)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be worse than coke)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(diet coke, be more expensive than coke)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(diet coke, be than regular coke)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(diet coke, be more expensive than coke)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(diet coke, be than regular coke)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(diet coke, be more expensive than coke)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be lighter than coke)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(diet coke, be more expensive than coke)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, weigh less than regular coke)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(diet coke, be more expensive than coke)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(diet coke, be lighter than coke)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(diet coke, be more expensive than coke)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(diet coke, be lighter than coke)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(diet coke, be more expensive than coke)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be better than coke)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(diet coke, be more expensive than coke)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be less dense than coke)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(diet coke, be more expensive than coke)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be than coke)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(diet coke, be more expensive than coke)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(diet coke, have less mass than regular coke)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(diet coke, be more expensive than coke)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be than regular coke)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(diet coke, be more expensive than coke)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(diet coke, weigh less than regular coke)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(diet coke, be more expensive than coke)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(diet coke, be worse than coke)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(diet coke, be more expensive than coke)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be more dense than coke)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(diet coke, be more expensive than coke)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(diet coke, weigh less than regular coke)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(diet coke, be more expensive than coke)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(diet coke, be worse than coke)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(diet coke, be more expensive than coke)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(diet coke, have less mass than regular coke)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(diet coke, be more expensive than coke)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(diet coke, be more expensive than coke)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be more expensive than coke)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(diet coke, be more expensive than coke)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(diet coke, be more expensive than coke)