diet coke: explode in freezer

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents soft drink
Weight: 0.71
, drink
Weight: 0.69
, diet
Weight: 0.69
, product
Weight: 0.65
Siblings chocolate milk
Weight: 0.36
, coca cola
Weight: 0.36
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.36
, soda
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
explode in freezer 1.00
explode with mentos 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(drink, explode in freezer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(diet coke, explode in freezer)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(soft drink, explode in freezer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(diet coke, explode in freezer)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(diet coke, explode in freezer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(soft drink, explode in freezer)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(diet coke, explode in freezer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(drink, explode in freezer)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.58
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, explode in freezer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, explode in freezer)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, explode in freezer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(drink, explode in freezer)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, explode in freezer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, explode with mentos)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(drink, explode in freezer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(diet coke, explode in freezer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(diet coke, explode in freezer)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(soft drink, explode in freezer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(diet coke, explode in freezer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(diet coke, explode in freezer)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(diet coke, explode in freezer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(coca cola, explode with mentos) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(coca cola, explode with mentos)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(diet coke, explode in freezer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(diet coke, explode in freezer)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(diet coke, explode in freezer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(diet coke, explode with mentos)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(diet coke, explode in freezer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(diet coke, explode with mentos)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(diet coke, explode in freezer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, explode with mentos)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(diet coke, explode in freezer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(diet coke, explode with mentos)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(diet coke, explode in freezer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(diet coke, explode in freezer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, explode in freezer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(diet coke, explode in freezer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(diet coke, explode in freezer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, explode in freezer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(soft drink, explode in freezer)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, explode in freezer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(drink, explode in freezer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, explode in freezer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(coca cola, explode with mentos)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(diet coke, explode in freezer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(soft drink, explode in freezer)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(diet coke, explode in freezer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(drink, explode in freezer)