diet: be bad for dogs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents strategy
Weight: 0.63
, diabetes
Weight: 0.58
, trait
Weight: 0.58
, aspect
Weight: 0.58
, variable
Weight: 0.57
Siblings taste
Weight: 0.32
, approach
Weight: 0.31
, attitude
Weight: 0.31
, consumption
Weight: 0.31
, flavor
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for dogs 1.00
good to dogs 0.96
be bad for woman 0.76
be bad for heart 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(diet, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(taste, good to dogs)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(diet, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(consumption, be bad for woman)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(diet, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(taste, good to dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(taste, good to dogs)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(diet, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(consumption, be bad for woman) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(consumption, be bad for woman)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(diet, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(diet, be bad for dogs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(diet, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(diet, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(diet, be bad for dogs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(diet, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(diet, be bad for dogs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(diet, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(taste, good to dogs)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(diet, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(consumption, be bad for woman)