diet: stop working

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents strategy
Weight: 0.63
, diabetes
Weight: 0.58
, trait
Weight: 0.58
, aspect
Weight: 0.58
, variable
Weight: 0.57
Siblings taste
Weight: 0.32
, approach
Weight: 0.31
, attitude
Weight: 0.31
, consumption
Weight: 0.31
, flavor
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
stop working 1.00
work 0.80
affect working relationship 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(variable, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(diet, stop working)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(aspect, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(diet, stop working)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(trait, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(diet, stop working)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(strategy, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(diet, stop working)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(diet, stop working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(strategy, work)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(diet, stop working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(trait, work)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(diet, stop working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(aspect, work)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(diet, stop working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(variable, work)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(diet, stop working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(variable, work)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(diet, stop working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(aspect, work)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(diet, stop working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(trait, work)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(diet, stop working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(strategy, work)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(diet, stop working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(taste, work)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(diet, stop working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(flavor, work)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(diet, stop working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(attitude, affect working relationship)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(variable, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(diet, stop working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(diet, stop working)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(aspect, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(diet, stop working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(diet, stop working)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(trait, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(diet, stop working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(diet, stop working)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(strategy, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(diet, stop working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(diet, stop working)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(diet, stop working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(flavor, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(flavor, work)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(diet, stop working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(taste, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(taste, work)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(diet, stop working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(attitude, affect working relationship) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(attitude, affect working relationship)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(diet, stop working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(diet, stop working)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(diet, stop working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(diet, work)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(diet, stop working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(diet, work)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(diet, stop working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(diet, work)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(diet, stop working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(diet, work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(diet, stop working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(diet, stop working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(diet, stop working)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(diet, stop working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(diet, stop working)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(diet, stop working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(strategy, work)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(diet, stop working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(trait, work)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(diet, stop working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(aspect, work)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(diet, stop working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(variable, work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(diet, stop working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(flavor, work)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(diet, stop working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(taste, work)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(diet, stop working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(attitude, affect working relationship)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(diet, stop working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(strategy, work)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(diet, stop working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(trait, work)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(diet, stop working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(aspect, work)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(diet, stop working) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(variable, work)