diet: work in short term

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents strategy
Weight: 0.63
, diabetes
Weight: 0.58
, trait
Weight: 0.58
, aspect
Weight: 0.58
, variable
Weight: 0.57
Siblings taste
Weight: 0.32
, approach
Weight: 0.31
, attitude
Weight: 0.31
, consumption
Weight: 0.31
, flavor
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
work in short term 1.00
fail in long run 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(diet, work in short term)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(diet, work in short term)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(diet, work in short term)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(diet, fail in long run)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(diet, work in short term)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(diet, fail in long run)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(diet, work in short term)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(diet, fail in long run)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(diet, work in short term)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(diet, fail in long run)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(diet, work in short term)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(diet, work in short term)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(diet, work in short term)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(diet, work in short term)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(diet, work in short term)