difference: be in difference matching work

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.63
, need
Weight: 0.60
, event
Weight: 0.60
, consideration
Weight: 0.59
Siblings different people
Weight: 0.58
, range
Weight: 0.58
, add
Weight: 0.57
, implication
Weight: 0.55
, magnitude
Weight: 0.53

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in difference matching work 1.00
be different from factor pairs 0.76
need different amount 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.08
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(factor, be different from factor pairs)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(difference, be in difference matching work)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(difference, be in difference matching work)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(factor, be different from factor pairs)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(difference, be in difference matching work)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(factor, be different from factor pairs)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(difference, be in difference matching work)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(different people, need different amount)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.20
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(factor, be different from factor pairs)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(difference, be in difference matching work)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(difference, be in difference matching work)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(difference, be in difference matching work)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(different people, need different amount)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(different people, need different amount)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(difference, be in difference matching work)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(difference, be in difference matching work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(difference, be in difference matching work)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(difference, be in difference matching work)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(difference, be in difference matching work)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(difference, be in difference matching work)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(difference, be in difference matching work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(difference, be in difference matching work)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(factor, be different from factor pairs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(difference, be in difference matching work)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(different people, need different amount)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(difference, be in difference matching work)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(factor, be different from factor pairs)