diffusion: relate to cellular processes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.65
, mechanism
Weight: 0.62
, process
Weight: 0.57
, layer
Weight: 0.56
, type
Weight: 0.55
Siblings extraction
Weight: 0.33
, oxidation
Weight: 0.33
, fluorescence
Weight: 0.33
, recombination
Weight: 0.33
, hydrolysis
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
relate to cellular processes 1.00
is considered as processes 0.83
be essential for cellular function 0.83
is considered as complementary processes 0.79
relate to molecular weight of substance 0.77
differ from exocytosis 0.76
relate to characteristics of animal pylum 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(type, relate to characteristics of animal pylum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(diffusion, relate to cellular processes)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(diffusion, relate to cellular processes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(type, relate to characteristics of animal pylum)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(diffusion, relate to cellular processes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(type, relate to characteristics of animal pylum)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(diffusion, relate to cellular processes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(oxidation, is considered as complementary processes)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(diffusion, relate to cellular processes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(oxidation, is considered as processes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(type, relate to characteristics of animal pylum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(diffusion, relate to cellular processes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(diffusion, relate to cellular processes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(diffusion, relate to cellular processes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(oxidation, is considered as processes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(oxidation, is considered as processes)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(diffusion, relate to cellular processes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(oxidation, is considered as complementary processes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(oxidation, is considered as complementary processes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(diffusion, relate to cellular processes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(diffusion, relate to cellular processes)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(diffusion, relate to cellular processes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(diffusion, relate to molecular weight of substance)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(diffusion, relate to cellular processes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(diffusion, relate to molecular weight of substance)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(diffusion, relate to cellular processes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(diffusion, relate to molecular weight of substance)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(diffusion, relate to cellular processes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(diffusion, relate to molecular weight of substance)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(diffusion, relate to cellular processes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(diffusion, relate to cellular processes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(diffusion, relate to cellular processes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(diffusion, relate to cellular processes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(diffusion, relate to cellular processes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(diffusion, relate to cellular processes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(type, relate to characteristics of animal pylum)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(diffusion, relate to cellular processes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(oxidation, is considered as processes)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(diffusion, relate to cellular processes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(oxidation, is considered as complementary processes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(diffusion, relate to cellular processes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(type, relate to characteristics of animal pylum)