digestion: change surface area of food

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents process
Weight: 0.67
, function
Weight: 0.64
, autonomic nervous system
Weight: 0.60
, chemical reaction
Weight: 0.59
, activity
Weight: 0.59
Siblings metabolism
Weight: 0.36
, fermentation
Weight: 0.36
, photosynthesis
Weight: 0.35
, hydrolysis
Weight: 0.35
, cellular respiration
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
change surface area of food 1.00
is food 0.79
have located certain areas zones 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(activity, have located certain areas zones)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(digestion, change surface area of food)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(digestion, change surface area of food)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(activity, have located certain areas zones)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(digestion, change surface area of food)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(activity, have located certain areas zones)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(activity, have located certain areas zones)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(digestion, change surface area of food)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(digestion, change surface area of food)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(digestion, change surface area of food)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(digestion, change surface area of food)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(digestion, change surface area of food)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(digestion, is food)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(digestion, change surface area of food)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(digestion, is food)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(digestion, change surface area of food)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(digestion, is food)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(digestion, change surface area of food)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(digestion, is food)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(digestion, change surface area of food)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(digestion, change surface area of food)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(digestion, change surface area of food)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(digestion, change surface area of food)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(digestion, change surface area of food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(digestion, change surface area of food)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(activity, have located certain areas zones)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(digestion, change surface area of food)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(activity, have located certain areas zones)