digital camera: be better than smartphones

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.76
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.73
, photograph
Weight: 0.73
, camera
Weight: 0.62
Siblings mobile phone
Weight: 0.73
, computer
Weight: 0.71
, floppy disk
Weight: 0.64
, scanner
Weight: 0.63
, video
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than smartphones 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(camera, be better than smartphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(digital camera, be better than smartphones)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(digital camera, be better than smartphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(camera, be better than smartphones)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be better than smartphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(camera, be better than smartphones)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(camera, be better than smartphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(digital camera, be better than smartphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(digital camera, be better than smartphones)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(digital camera, be better than smartphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(digital camera, be better than smartphones)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(digital camera, be better than smartphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(digital camera, be better than smartphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be better than smartphones)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(digital camera, be better than smartphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(digital camera, be better than smartphones)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be better than smartphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(camera, be better than smartphones)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(digital camera, be better than smartphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(camera, be better than smartphones)