digital camera: be made

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.76
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.73
, photograph
Weight: 0.73
, camera
Weight: 0.62
Siblings mobile phone
Weight: 0.73
, computer
Weight: 0.71
, floppy disk
Weight: 0.64
, scanner
Weight: 0.63
, video
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be made 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(camera, be made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(digital camera, be made)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(digital camera, be made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(camera, be made)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(camera, be made)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be made)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(camera, be made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(digital camera, be made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(digital camera, be made)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(digital camera, be made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(mobile phone, be made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, be made)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(digital camera, be made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(digital camera, be made)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(digital camera, be made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(digital camera, be made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be made)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(digital camera, be made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(digital camera, be made)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(camera, be made)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be made)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(digital camera, be made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(camera, be made)