digital camera: interact with technologies

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.76
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.73
, photograph
Weight: 0.73
, camera
Weight: 0.62
Siblings mobile phone
Weight: 0.73
, computer
Weight: 0.71
, floppy disk
Weight: 0.64
, scanner
Weight: 0.63
, video
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
interact with technologies 1.00
interact with other technologies 0.99

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(camera, interact with other technologies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(digital camera, interact with technologies)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(digital camera, interact with technologies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(camera, interact with other technologies)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, interact with technologies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(camera, interact with other technologies)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(camera, interact with other technologies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(digital camera, interact with technologies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(digital camera, interact with technologies)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(digital camera, interact with technologies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(digital camera, interact with technologies)

Similarity expansion

0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(digital camera, interact with technologies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, interact with other technologies)
0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(digital camera, interact with technologies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(digital camera, interact with other technologies)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(digital camera, interact with technologies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(digital camera, interact with other technologies)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(digital camera, interact with technologies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(digital camera, interact with other technologies)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(digital camera, interact with technologies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(digital camera, interact with technologies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, interact with technologies)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(digital camera, interact with technologies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(digital camera, interact with technologies)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, interact with technologies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(camera, interact with other technologies)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(digital camera, interact with technologies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(camera, interact with other technologies)