dill: eat in kill

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents herb
Weight: 0.62
, recipe
Weight: 0.61
, spice
Weight: 0.59
, plant
Weight: 0.54
, flavor
Weight: 0.53
Siblings thyme
Weight: 0.37
, basil
Weight: 0.37
, rosemary
Weight: 0.37
, fennel
Weight: 0.37
, parsley
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
eat in kill 1.00
is kill 0.92
be important kill 0.89
be called kill 0.89
run away kill 0.85
cry in kill 0.83
brag lot kill 0.79
differ in kill 0.79
explain pants kill 0.78
was unusual kill 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(dill, eat in kill)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(dill, eat in kill)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(dill, eat in kill)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(dill, run away kill)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(dill, eat in kill)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(dill, run away kill)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(dill, eat in kill)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(dill, run away kill)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(dill, eat in kill)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(dill, cry in kill)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(dill, eat in kill)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(dill, is kill)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(dill, eat in kill)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(dill, cry in kill)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(dill, eat in kill)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(dill, cry in kill)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(dill, eat in kill)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(dill, is kill)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(dill, eat in kill)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(dill, be called kill)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(dill, eat in kill)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(dill, run away kill)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(dill, eat in kill)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(dill, is kill)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(dill, eat in kill)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(dill, is kill)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(dill, eat in kill)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(dill, be called kill)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(dill, eat in kill)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(dill, cry in kill)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(dill, eat in kill)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(dill, be important kill)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(dill, eat in kill)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(dill, differ in kill)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(dill, eat in kill)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(dill, be called kill)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(dill, eat in kill)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(dill, be called kill)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(dill, eat in kill)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(dill, was unusual kill)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(dill, eat in kill)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(dill, differ in kill)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(dill, eat in kill)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(dill, differ in kill)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(dill, eat in kill)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(dill, was unusual kill)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(dill, eat in kill)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(dill, be important kill)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(dill, eat in kill)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(dill, was unusual kill)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(dill, eat in kill)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(dill, differ in kill)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(dill, eat in kill)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(dill, was unusual kill)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(dill, eat in kill)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(dill, be important kill)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(dill, eat in kill)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(dill, be important kill)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(dill, eat in kill)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(dill, eat in kill)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(dill, eat in kill)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(dill, eat in kill)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(dill, eat in kill)