dill: explain loss of pants

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents herb
Weight: 0.62
, recipe
Weight: 0.61
, spice
Weight: 0.59
, plant
Weight: 0.54
, flavor
Weight: 0.53
Siblings thyme
Weight: 0.37
, basil
Weight: 0.37
, rosemary
Weight: 0.37
, fennel
Weight: 0.37
, parsley
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
explain loss of pants 1.00
explain pants kill 0.89
explain missing pants 0.88
explain jem missing pants 0.87
explain jems missing pants 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(dill, explain loss of pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(dill, explain loss of pants)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(dill, explain loss of pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(dill, explain missing pants)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(dill, explain loss of pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(dill, explain jem missing pants)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(dill, explain loss of pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(dill, explain missing pants)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(dill, explain loss of pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(dill, explain jems missing pants)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(dill, explain loss of pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(dill, explain jem missing pants)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(dill, explain loss of pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(dill, explain missing pants)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(dill, explain loss of pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(dill, explain jems missing pants)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(dill, explain loss of pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(dill, explain jems missing pants)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(dill, explain loss of pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(dill, explain jem missing pants)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(dill, explain loss of pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(dill, explain missing pants)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(dill, explain loss of pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(dill, explain jem missing pants)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(dill, explain loss of pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(dill, explain jems missing pants)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(dill, explain loss of pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(dill, explain loss of pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(dill, explain loss of pants)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(dill, explain loss of pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(dill, explain loss of pants)