dim sum: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.63
, dish
Weight: 0.62
, chinese food
Weight: 0.60
, item
Weight: 0.56
, food
Weight: 0.56
Siblings congee
Weight: 0.39
, sum
Weight: 0.35
, dark matter
Weight: 0.34
, living thing
Weight: 0.32
, picture frame
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(dim sum, is expensive)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(dim sum, is expensive)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(item, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(dim sum, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(dim sum, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(item, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(dim sum, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(food, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(dim sum, is expensive)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(dim sum, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(item, is expensive)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(dim sum, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(food, is expensive)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(dim sum, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(dim sum, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(picture frame, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(dim sum, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(sum, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(dim sum, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(dim sum, is expensive)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(dim sum, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(dim sum, is expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(item, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(dim sum, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(dim sum, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(dim sum, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(sum, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(sum, is expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(dim sum, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(picture frame, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(picture frame, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(dim sum, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(dim sum, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(dim sum, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(dim sum, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(dim sum, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(dim sum, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(dim sum, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(dim sum, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(item, is expensive)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(dim sum, is expensive)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is expensive)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(dim sum, is expensive)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(dim sum, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(sum, is expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(dim sum, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(picture frame, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(dim sum, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(item, is expensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(dim sum, is expensive)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is expensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(dim sum, is expensive)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)