dine table: be used to family discussion

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to family discussion 1.00
be used to discussion 0.94

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(dine table, be used to family discussion)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(dine table, be used to family discussion)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(dine table, be used to family discussion)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(dine table, be used to discussion)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(dine table, be used to family discussion)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(dine table, be used to discussion)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(dine table, be used to family discussion)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(dine table, be used to discussion)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(dine table, be used to family discussion)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(dine table, be used to discussion)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(dine table, be used to family discussion)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(dine table, be used to family discussion)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(dine table, be used to family discussion)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(dine table, be used to family discussion)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(dine table, be used to family discussion)