diner: has side of fry

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.58
, show
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.54
, film
Weight: 0.52
, event
Weight: 0.51
Siblings pizza
Weight: 0.34
, hamburger
Weight: 0.34
, fast food
Weight: 0.33
, deli
Weight: 0.33
, italian restaurant
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has side of fry 1.00
order french fry 0.82
be cook on grill 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(diner, has side of fry)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be cook on grill)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(diner, has side of fry)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(hamburger, be cook on grill)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(hamburger, be cook on grill)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(diner, has side of fry)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(diner, has side of fry)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(diner, has side of fry)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(diner, order french fry)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(diner, has side of fry)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(diner, order french fry)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(diner, has side of fry)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(diner, order french fry)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(diner, has side of fry)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(diner, order french fry)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(diner, has side of fry)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(diner, has side of fry)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(diner, has side of fry)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(diner, has side of fry)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(diner, has side of fry)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(diner, has side of fry)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(hamburger, be cook on grill)