diner: is popular

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.58
, show
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.54
, film
Weight: 0.52
, event
Weight: 0.51
Siblings pizza
Weight: 0.34
, hamburger
Weight: 0.34
, taco bell
Weight: 0.34
, fast food
Weight: 0.33
, deli
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is popular 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(fast food restaurant, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(diner, is popular)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(film, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(diner, is popular)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(diner, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(film, is popular)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(diner, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, is popular)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(diner, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, is popular)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(diner, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(film, is popular)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(diner, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, is popular)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(diner, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(taco bell, is popular)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(diner, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(pizza, is popular)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(diner, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is popular)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(fast food restaurant, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(diner, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(diner, is popular)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(film, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(diner, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(diner, is popular)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(diner, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(fast food, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fast food, is popular)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(diner, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(taco bell, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(taco bell, is popular)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(diner, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(pizza, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(pizza, is popular)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(diner, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(hamburger, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(hamburger, is popular)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(diner, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(diner, is popular)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(diner, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(diner, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(diner, is popular)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(diner, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(diner, is popular)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(diner, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(film, is popular)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(diner, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, is popular)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(diner, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(fast food, is popular)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(diner, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(taco bell, is popular)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(diner, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(hamburger, is popular)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(diner, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(pizza, is popular)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(diner, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(film, is popular)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(diner, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, is popular)