diner: order special

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.58
, show
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.54
, film
Weight: 0.52
, event
Weight: 0.51
Siblings pizza
Weight: 0.34
, hamburger
Weight: 0.34
, fast food
Weight: 0.33
, deli
Weight: 0.33
, italian restaurant
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
order special 1.00
be used to order dinner 0.78
order dinner 0.78
choose to order food 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(diner, order special)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to order dinner)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(diner, order special)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to order dinner)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be used to order dinner)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(diner, order special)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(diner, order special)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(diner, order special)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(diner, choose to order food)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(diner, order special)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(diner, order dinner)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(diner, order special)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(diner, order dinner)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(diner, order special)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(diner, order dinner)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(diner, order special)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(diner, order dinner)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(diner, order special)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(diner, choose to order food)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(diner, order special)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(diner, choose to order food)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(diner, order special)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(diner, choose to order food)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(diner, order special)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(diner, order special)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(diner, order special)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(diner, order special)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(diner, order special)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(diner, order special)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be used to order dinner)