dingo: live in australia

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.66
, creature
Weight: 0.49
, puppy
Weight: 0.48
, species
Weight: 0.46
, wolf
Weight: 0.46
Siblings cougar
Weight: 0.37
, coyote
Weight: 0.36
, grizzly bear
Weight: 0.36
, wallaby
Weight: 0.36
, saber-toothed cat
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
live in australia 1.00
protect themselfs in australia 0.88
were introduced australia 0.86
be in france 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(dingo, live in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(wallaby, live in australia)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(dingo, live in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(wallaby, live in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(wallaby, live in australia)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(dingo, live in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(dingo, live in australia)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(dingo, live in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(dingo, protect themselfs in australia)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(dingo, live in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(dingo, protect themselfs in australia)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(dingo, live in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(dingo, were introduced australia)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(dingo, live in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(dingo, were introduced australia)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(dingo, live in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(dingo, protect themselfs in australia)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(dingo, live in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(dingo, were introduced australia)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(dingo, live in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(dingo, protect themselfs in australia)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(dingo, live in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(dingo, were introduced australia)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(dingo, live in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(dingo, live in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(dingo, live in australia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(dingo, live in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(dingo, live in australia)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(dingo, live in australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(wallaby, live in australia)