dinner: be for one popular

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents gift
Weight: 0.66
, event
Weight: 0.64
, meal
Weight: 0.63
, item
Weight: 0.61
Siblings thanksgiving
Weight: 0.63
, lunch
Weight: 0.63
, reception
Weight: 0.61
, brunch
Weight: 0.57
, breakfast
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be for one popular 1.00
be for one popular in germany 0.81
be for 40 0.77
is famous 0.77
be in one nation 0.76
be important to organisation 0.76
be less rare than common ones 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(event, be in one nation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(dinner, be for one popular)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(dinner, be for one popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(event, be in one nation)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(dinner, be for one popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(event, be in one nation)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(dinner, be for one popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(lunch, is famous)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(dinner, be for one popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(reception, be important to organisation)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(event, be in one nation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(dinner, be for one popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(dinner, be for one popular)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(dinner, be for one popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(reception, be important to organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(reception, be important to organisation)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(dinner, be for one popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(lunch, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(lunch, is famous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(dinner, be for one popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(dinner, be for one popular)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(dinner, be for one popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(dinner, be for one popular in germany)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(dinner, be for one popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(dinner, be for one popular in germany)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(dinner, be for one popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(dinner, be for one popular in germany)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(dinner, be for one popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(dinner, be for 40)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(dinner, be for one popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(dinner, be for 40)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(dinner, be for one popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(dinner, be for 40)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(dinner, be for one popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(dinner, be for 40)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(dinner, be for one popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(dinner, be for one popular in germany)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(dinner, be for one popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(dinner, be for one popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(dinner, be for one popular)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(dinner, be for one popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(dinner, be for one popular)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(dinner, be for one popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(event, be in one nation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(dinner, be for one popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(reception, be important to organisation)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(dinner, be for one popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(lunch, is famous)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(dinner, be for one popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(event, be in one nation)