dinosaur: were dangerous

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents species
Weight: 0.72
, creature
Weight: 0.67
, animal
Weight: 0.61
, reptile
Weight: 0.60
Siblings tyrannosaurus
Weight: 0.78
, raptor
Weight: 0.67
, fossil
Weight: 0.57
, lizard
Weight: 0.38
, great horned owl
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
were dangerous 1.00
were difficult 0.81
were different colours 0.79
be harmful 0.77
were alive humans were 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(dinosaur, were dangerous)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(dinosaur, were dangerous)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(dinosaur, were dangerous)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(dinosaur, were different colours)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(dinosaur, were dangerous)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(dinosaur, were different colours)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(dinosaur, were dangerous)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(dinosaur, were different colours)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(dinosaur, were dangerous)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(dinosaur, were different colours)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(dinosaur, were dangerous)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(dinosaur, were alive humans were)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(dinosaur, were dangerous)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(dinosaur, be harmful)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(dinosaur, were dangerous)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(dinosaur, were alive humans were)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(dinosaur, were dangerous)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(dinosaur, be harmful)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(dinosaur, were dangerous)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(dinosaur, were alive humans were)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(dinosaur, were dangerous)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(dinosaur, be harmful)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(dinosaur, were dangerous)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(dinosaur, be harmful)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(dinosaur, were dangerous)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(dinosaur, were alive humans were)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(dinosaur, were dangerous)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(dinosaur, were dangerous)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(dinosaur, were dangerous)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(dinosaur, were dangerous)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(dinosaur, were dangerous)