disappointment: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feeling
Weight: 0.70
, emotion
Weight: 0.62
, challenge
Weight: 0.61
, consequence
Weight: 0.59
, word
Weight: 0.58
Siblings frustration
Weight: 0.37
, sadness
Weight: 0.37
, anguish
Weight: 0.36
, joy
Weight: 0.36
, despair
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
is good thing 0.78
have good side 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(challenge, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(disappointment, has quality good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(word, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(disappointment, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(emotion, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(disappointment, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(consequence, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(disappointment, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(feeling, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(disappointment, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(emotion, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(disappointment, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(disappointment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(emotion, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(disappointment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(feeling, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(disappointment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(consequence, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(disappointment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(emotion, is good thing)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(disappointment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(word, has quality bad)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(disappointment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(challenge, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.58
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(disappointment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(emotion, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(disappointment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(challenge, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(disappointment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(consequence, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(disappointment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(feeling, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(disappointment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(word, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(disappointment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(emotion, is good thing)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(disappointment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(frustration, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(disappointment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(sadness, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(disappointment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(sadness, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(disappointment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(sadness, is good thing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(challenge, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(disappointment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(disappointment, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(emotion, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(disappointment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(disappointment, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(word, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(disappointment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(disappointment, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(consequence, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(disappointment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(disappointment, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(feeling, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(disappointment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(disappointment, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(emotion, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(disappointment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(disappointment, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(disappointment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(frustration, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(frustration, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(disappointment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(sadness, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(sadness, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(disappointment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(sadness, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(sadness, is good thing)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(disappointment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(sadness, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(sadness, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(disappointment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(disappointment, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(disappointment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(disappointment, is good thing)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(disappointment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(disappointment, have good side)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(disappointment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(disappointment, have good side)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(disappointment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(disappointment, is good thing)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(disappointment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(disappointment, have good side)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(disappointment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(disappointment, have good side)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(disappointment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(disappointment, is good thing)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(disappointment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(disappointment, have good side)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(disappointment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(disappointment, have good side)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(disappointment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(disappointment, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(disappointment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(disappointment, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(disappointment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(disappointment, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(disappointment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(disappointment, have good side)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(disappointment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(disappointment, have good side)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(disappointment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(disappointment, is good thing)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(disappointment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(disappointment, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(disappointment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(disappointment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(disappointment, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(disappointment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(disappointment, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(disappointment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(emotion, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(disappointment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(challenge, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(disappointment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(feeling, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(disappointment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(consequence, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(disappointment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(word, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(disappointment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(emotion, is good thing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(disappointment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(frustration, has quality good)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(disappointment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(sadness, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(disappointment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(sadness, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(disappointment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(sadness, is good thing)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(disappointment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(emotion, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(disappointment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(feeling, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(disappointment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(consequence, has quality bad)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(disappointment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(emotion, is good thing)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(disappointment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(challenge, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(disappointment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(word, has quality bad)