discharge: is great

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents variable
Weight: 0.61
, symptom
Weight: 0.59
, matter
Weight: 0.59
, condition
Weight: 0.58
Siblings pus
Weight: 0.49
, fecal matter
Weight: 0.32
, renal failure
Weight: 0.32
, respiratory failure
Weight: 0.32
, pleural effusion
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is great 1.00
feel good 0.83
has quality good 0.81
be important to us 0.77
feel solid 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(discharge, is great)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(pleural effusion, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(discharge, is great)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(pus, feel good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(discharge, is great)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pus, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(discharge, is great)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(pus, feel good)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(pus, feel good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(discharge, is great)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(pleural effusion, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(pleural effusion, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(discharge, is great)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(pus, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(pus, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(discharge, is great)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(discharge, is great)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(discharge, is great)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(discharge, has quality good)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(discharge, is great)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(discharge, has quality good)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(discharge, is great)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(discharge, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(discharge, is great)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(discharge, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(discharge, is great)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(discharge, is great)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(discharge, is great)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(discharge, is great)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(discharge, is great)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(discharge, is great)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(pleural effusion, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(discharge, is great)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(pus, feel good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(discharge, is great)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(pus, has quality good)