discipline: be foundational to interdisciplinarity

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents virtue
Weight: 0.66
, trait
Weight: 0.66
, rule
Weight: 0.63
, attribute
Weight: 0.61
, aspect
Weight: 0.61
Siblings ethic
Weight: 0.69
, creativity
Weight: 0.66
, quality
Weight: 0.62
, patience
Weight: 0.62
, academic
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be foundational to interdisciplinarity 1.00
be important to science 0.76
be important in science 0.76
be unimportant in process of evolution 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(trait, be unimportant in process of evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(discipline, be foundational to interdisciplinarity)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(discipline, be foundational to interdisciplinarity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(trait, be unimportant in process of evolution)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(discipline, be foundational to interdisciplinarity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(trait, be unimportant in process of evolution)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(discipline, be foundational to interdisciplinarity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(creativity, be important in science)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(discipline, be foundational to interdisciplinarity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(creativity, be important to science)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(trait, be unimportant in process of evolution) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(discipline, be foundational to interdisciplinarity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(discipline, be foundational to interdisciplinarity)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(discipline, be foundational to interdisciplinarity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(creativity, be important to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(creativity, be important to science)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(discipline, be foundational to interdisciplinarity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(creativity, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(creativity, be important in science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(discipline, be foundational to interdisciplinarity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(discipline, be foundational to interdisciplinarity)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(discipline, be foundational to interdisciplinarity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(discipline, be foundational to interdisciplinarity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(discipline, be foundational to interdisciplinarity)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(discipline, be foundational to interdisciplinarity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(discipline, be foundational to interdisciplinarity)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(discipline, be foundational to interdisciplinarity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(trait, be unimportant in process of evolution)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(discipline, be foundational to interdisciplinarity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(creativity, be important to science)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(discipline, be foundational to interdisciplinarity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(creativity, be important in science)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(discipline, be foundational to interdisciplinarity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(trait, be unimportant in process of evolution)