discussion: be about politics

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dialogue
Weight: 0.66
, agenda
Weight: 0.63
, community
Weight: 0.63
, plan
Weight: 0.62
, event
Weight: 0.62
Siblings forum
Weight: 0.67
, lecture
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.34
, meeting
Weight: 0.34
, seminar
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be about politics 1.00
be about politics considered 0.96
be about religion 0.79
be about religion considered 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(discussion, be about politics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(discussion, be about politics)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(discussion, be about politics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(discussion, be about politics considered)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(discussion, be about politics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(discussion, be about politics considered)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(discussion, be about politics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(discussion, be about politics considered)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(discussion, be about politics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(discussion, be about religion)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(discussion, be about politics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(discussion, be about religion considered)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(discussion, be about politics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(discussion, be about religion)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(discussion, be about politics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(discussion, be about politics considered)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(discussion, be about politics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(discussion, be about religion considered)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(discussion, be about politics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(discussion, be about religion)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(discussion, be about politics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(discussion, be about religion considered)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(discussion, be about politics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(discussion, be about religion)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(discussion, be about politics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(discussion, be about religion considered)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(discussion, be about politics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(discussion, be about politics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(discussion, be about politics)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(discussion, be about politics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(discussion, be about politics)