discussion: be about sex topics

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dialogue
Weight: 0.66
, agenda
Weight: 0.63
, community
Weight: 0.63
, plan
Weight: 0.62
, event
Weight: 0.62
Siblings forum
Weight: 0.67
, lecture
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.34
, meeting
Weight: 0.34
, seminar
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be about sex topics 1.00
be about sex topics taboo 0.94
is topics 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(discussion, be about sex topics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(seminar, is topics)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(discussion, be about sex topics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(seminar, is topics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(seminar, is topics)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(discussion, be about sex topics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(discussion, be about sex topics)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(discussion, be about sex topics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(discussion, be about sex topics taboo)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(discussion, be about sex topics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(discussion, be about sex topics taboo)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(discussion, be about sex topics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(discussion, be about sex topics taboo)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(discussion, be about sex topics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(discussion, be about sex topics taboo)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(discussion, be about sex topics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(discussion, be about sex topics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(discussion, be about sex topics)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(discussion, be about sex topics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(discussion, be about sex topics)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(discussion, be about sex topics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(seminar, is topics)