discussion: be down voted

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dialogue
Weight: 0.66
, agenda
Weight: 0.63
, community
Weight: 0.63
, plan
Weight: 0.62
, event
Weight: 0.62
Siblings forum
Weight: 0.67
, lecture
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.34
, meeting
Weight: 0.34
, seminar
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be down voted 1.00
be down voted to hell 0.93
was rejected 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(plan, was rejected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(discussion, be down voted)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(discussion, be down voted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(plan, was rejected)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(discussion, be down voted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(plan, was rejected)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.21
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(plan, was rejected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(discussion, be down voted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(discussion, be down voted)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(discussion, be down voted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(discussion, be down voted)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(discussion, be down voted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(discussion, be down voted to hell)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(discussion, be down voted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(discussion, be down voted to hell)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(discussion, be down voted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(discussion, be down voted to hell)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(discussion, be down voted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(discussion, be down voted to hell)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(discussion, be down voted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(discussion, be down voted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(discussion, be down voted)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(discussion, be down voted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(discussion, be down voted)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(discussion, be down voted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(plan, was rejected)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(discussion, be down voted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(plan, was rejected)