discussion: is is deleted

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dialogue
Weight: 0.66
, agenda
Weight: 0.63
, community
Weight: 0.63
, plan
Weight: 0.62
, event
Weight: 0.62
Siblings forum
Weight: 0.67
, lecture
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.34
, meeting
Weight: 0.34
, seminar
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is is deleted 1.00
being deleted 0.97
being are deleted 0.94
being removed 0.76
be about server status removed 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(discussion, is is deleted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(topic, being are deleted)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(discussion, is is deleted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(topic, being are deleted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(topic, being are deleted)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(discussion, is is deleted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(discussion, is is deleted)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(discussion, is is deleted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(discussion, being deleted)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(discussion, is is deleted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(discussion, being deleted)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(discussion, is is deleted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(discussion, being deleted)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(discussion, is is deleted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(discussion, being deleted)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(discussion, is is deleted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(discussion, be about server status removed)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(discussion, is is deleted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(discussion, be about server status removed)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(discussion, is is deleted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(discussion, be about server status removed)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(discussion, is is deleted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(discussion, be about server status removed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(discussion, is is deleted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(discussion, is is deleted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(discussion, is is deleted)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(discussion, is is deleted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(discussion, is is deleted)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(discussion, is is deleted) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(topic, being are deleted)