disease: were treated in victorian times

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mental disorder
Weight: 0.69
, mental illness
Weight: 0.68
, heart disease
Weight: 0.65
, plague
Weight: 0.55
Siblings lyme disease
Weight: 0.86
, pelvic inflammatory disease
Weight: 0.80
, bubonic plague
Weight: 0.75
, macular degeneration
Weight: 0.74
, sickle cell anemia
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
were treated in victorian times 1.00
were treated in times 0.88
were treated in medieval time 0.85
were treated in time 0.85
were treated in 1700s 0.85
were treated 0.83
was treated in 1800s 0.82
was treated 0.81
get treated 0.81
were treated in ages 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(mental illness, was treated in 1800s)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(disease, were treated in victorian times)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(plague, were treated)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(disease, were treated in victorian times)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(mental illness, was treated)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(disease, were treated in victorian times)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(disease, were treated in victorian times)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(mental illness, was treated)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(disease, were treated in victorian times)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(plague, were treated)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(disease, were treated in victorian times)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(mental illness, was treated in 1800s)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(disease, were treated in victorian times)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(mental illness, was treated in 1800s)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(disease, were treated in victorian times)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(plague, were treated)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(disease, were treated in victorian times)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(mental illness, was treated)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(disease, were treated in victorian times)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(macular degeneration, get treated)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(mental illness, was treated in 1800s)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(disease, were treated in victorian times)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(disease, were treated in victorian times)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(plague, were treated)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(disease, were treated in victorian times)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(disease, were treated in victorian times)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(mental illness, was treated)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(disease, were treated in victorian times)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(disease, were treated in victorian times)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(disease, were treated in victorian times)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(macular degeneration, get treated)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(macular degeneration, get treated)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(disease, were treated in victorian times)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(disease, were treated in victorian times)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(disease, were treated in victorian times)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(disease, were treated in medieval time)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(disease, were treated in victorian times)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(disease, were treated in medieval time)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(disease, were treated in victorian times)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(disease, were treated in medieval time)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(disease, were treated in victorian times)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(disease, were treated in 1700s)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(disease, were treated in victorian times)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(disease, were treated in 1700s)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(disease, were treated in victorian times)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(disease, were treated in 1700s)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(disease, were treated in victorian times)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(disease, were treated in 1700s)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(disease, were treated in victorian times)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(disease, were treated in medieval time)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(disease, were treated in victorian times)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(disease, were treated in victorian times)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(disease, were treated in victorian times)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(disease, were treated in victorian times)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(disease, were treated in victorian times)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(disease, were treated in victorian times)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(mental illness, was treated)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(disease, were treated in victorian times)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(plague, were treated)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(disease, were treated in victorian times)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(mental illness, was treated in 1800s)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(disease, were treated in victorian times)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(macular degeneration, get treated)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(disease, were treated in victorian times)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(mental illness, was treated)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(disease, were treated in victorian times)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(plague, were treated)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(disease, were treated in victorian times)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(mental illness, was treated in 1800s)