dislocation: be more common in cervical vertebrae

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents injury
Weight: 0.67
, complication
Weight: 0.60
, problem
Weight: 0.59
, condition
Weight: 0.55
, theme
Weight: 0.50
Siblings fracture
Weight: 0.35
, swelling
Weight: 0.35
, paralysis
Weight: 0.34
, whiplash
Weight: 0.34
, rupture
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more common in cervical vertebrae 1.00
be common in cervical vertebrae 1.00
be more common in vertebrae 0.93
be common in vertebrae 0.93
be to knee ligaments common 0.83
be to knee ligaments 0.81
be to cartilages 0.80
be diagnosed as hydrocele in testicular torsions 0.80
be to clavicle common 0.80
be to scaphoid bone 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(injury, be to knee ligaments common)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(dislocation, be more common in cervical vertebrae)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(injury, be to clavicle common)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(dislocation, be more common in cervical vertebrae)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(dislocation, be more common in cervical vertebrae)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(injury, be to knee ligaments common)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(dislocation, be more common in cervical vertebrae)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(injury, be to clavicle common)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(dislocation, be more common in cervical vertebrae)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(injury, be to clavicle common)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(dislocation, be more common in cervical vertebrae)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(injury, be to knee ligaments common)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(dislocation, be more common in cervical vertebrae)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(fracture, be more common in cervical vertebrae)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(dislocation, be more common in cervical vertebrae)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(fracture, be common in cervical vertebrae)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(dislocation, be more common in cervical vertebrae)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(fracture, be more common in vertebrae)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(dislocation, be more common in cervical vertebrae)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fracture, be common in vertebrae)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(dislocation, be more common in cervical vertebrae)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(swelling, be diagnosed as hydrocele in testicular torsions)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(dislocation, be more common in cervical vertebrae)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fracture, be to scaphoid bone)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(injury, be to knee ligaments common)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(dislocation, be more common in cervical vertebrae)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(dislocation, be more common in cervical vertebrae)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(injury, be to clavicle common)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(dislocation, be more common in cervical vertebrae)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(dislocation, be more common in cervical vertebrae)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(dislocation, be more common in cervical vertebrae)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(fracture, be more common in cervical vertebrae)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(fracture, be more common in cervical vertebrae)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(dislocation, be more common in cervical vertebrae)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(fracture, be common in cervical vertebrae)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(fracture, be common in cervical vertebrae)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(dislocation, be more common in cervical vertebrae)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(fracture, be common in vertebrae)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(fracture, be common in vertebrae)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(dislocation, be more common in cervical vertebrae)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(fracture, be more common in vertebrae)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(fracture, be more common in vertebrae)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(dislocation, be more common in cervical vertebrae)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(fracture, be to scaphoid bone)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(fracture, be to scaphoid bone)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(dislocation, be more common in cervical vertebrae)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(swelling, be diagnosed as hydrocele in testicular torsions)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(swelling, be diagnosed as hydrocele in testicular torsions)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(dislocation, be more common in cervical vertebrae)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(dislocation, be more common in cervical vertebrae)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(dislocation, be more common in cervical vertebrae)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(dislocation, be common in cervical vertebrae)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(dislocation, be more common in cervical vertebrae)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(dislocation, be more common in vertebrae)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(dislocation, be more common in cervical vertebrae)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(dislocation, be common in vertebrae)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(dislocation, be more common in cervical vertebrae)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(dislocation, be common in cervical vertebrae)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(dislocation, be more common in cervical vertebrae)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(dislocation, be common in cervical vertebrae)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(dislocation, be more common in cervical vertebrae)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(dislocation, be more common in vertebrae)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(dislocation, be more common in cervical vertebrae)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(dislocation, be more common in vertebrae)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(dislocation, be more common in cervical vertebrae)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(dislocation, be common in vertebrae)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(dislocation, be more common in cervical vertebrae)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(dislocation, be common in vertebrae)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(dislocation, be more common in cervical vertebrae)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(dislocation, be common in cervical vertebrae)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(dislocation, be more common in cervical vertebrae)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(dislocation, be more common in vertebrae)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(dislocation, be more common in cervical vertebrae)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(dislocation, be common in vertebrae)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(dislocation, be more common in cervical vertebrae)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(dislocation, be more common in cervical vertebrae)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(dislocation, be more common in cervical vertebrae)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(dislocation, be more common in cervical vertebrae)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(dislocation, be more common in cervical vertebrae)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(dislocation, be more common in cervical vertebrae)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(injury, be to clavicle common)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(dislocation, be more common in cervical vertebrae)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(injury, be to knee ligaments common)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(dislocation, be more common in cervical vertebrae)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(fracture, be common in vertebrae)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(dislocation, be more common in cervical vertebrae)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(fracture, be to scaphoid bone)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(dislocation, be more common in cervical vertebrae)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(fracture, be more common in vertebrae)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(dislocation, be more common in cervical vertebrae)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(fracture, be more common in cervical vertebrae)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(dislocation, be more common in cervical vertebrae)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(fracture, be common in cervical vertebrae)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(dislocation, be more common in cervical vertebrae)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(swelling, be diagnosed as hydrocele in testicular torsions)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(dislocation, be more common in cervical vertebrae)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(injury, be to knee ligaments common)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(dislocation, be more common in cervical vertebrae)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(injury, be to clavicle common)