display: is none

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents exhibit
Weight: 0.69
, behavior
Weight: 0.63
, field
Weight: 0.62
, signal
Weight: 0.60
Siblings exhibition
Weight: 0.64
, performance
Weight: 0.63
, screen
Weight: 0.62
, touchscreen
Weight: 0.61
, crt
Weight: 0.55

Related properties

Property Similarity
is none 1.00
be any better 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(display, is none) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(crt, be any better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(display, is none) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(crt, be any better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(crt, be any better)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(display, is none) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(display, is none)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(display, is none) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(display, is none) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(display, is none)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(display, is none) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(display, is none)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(display, is none) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(crt, be any better)