distortion: is factor

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.62
, sound
Weight: 0.57
, parameter
Weight: 0.57
, factor
Weight: 0.56
Siblings amplification
Weight: 0.54
, astigmatism
Weight: 0.53
, jitter
Weight: 0.33
, polarization
Weight: 0.33
, inequality
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is factor 1.00
be important factor keep 0.93
be important factor keep in mind 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(distortion, is factor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(amplification, is factor)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(distortion, is factor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(amplification, is factor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(amplification, is factor)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(distortion, is factor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(distortion, is factor)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(distortion, is factor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(distortion, be important factor keep)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(distortion, is factor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(distortion, be important factor keep in mind)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(distortion, is factor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(distortion, be important factor keep)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(distortion, is factor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(distortion, be important factor keep in mind)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(distortion, is factor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(distortion, be important factor keep)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(distortion, is factor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(distortion, be important factor keep in mind)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(distortion, is factor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(distortion, be important factor keep)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(distortion, is factor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(distortion, be important factor keep in mind)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(distortion, is factor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(distortion, is factor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(distortion, is factor)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(distortion, is factor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(distortion, is factor)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(distortion, is factor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(amplification, is factor)