district: is national park

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents school district
Weight: 0.84
, town
Weight: 0.72
, state
Weight: 0.68
, region
Weight: 0.62
Siblings high school
Weight: 0.71
, kolkata
Weight: 0.45
, galilee
Weight: 0.43
, karachi
Weight: 0.41
, lucknow
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
is national park 1.00
is park 0.90
is national 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(state, is park)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(district, is national park)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(district, is national park)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(state, is park)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(district, is national park)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(state, is park)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(state, is park)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(district, is national park)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(district, is national park)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(district, is national park)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(district, is national park)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(district, is national park)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(district, is park)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(district, is national park)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(district, is park)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(district, is national park)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(district, is park)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(district, is national park)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(district, is park)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(district, is national park)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(district, is national)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(district, is national park)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(district, is national)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(district, is national park)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(district, is national)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(district, is national park)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(district, is national)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(district, is national park)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(district, is national park)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(district, is national park)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(district, is national park)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(district, is national park)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(district, is national park)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(state, is park)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(district, is national park)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(state, is park)