division: be opposite of multiplication

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents unit
Weight: 0.69
, department
Weight: 0.61
, corporation
Weight: 0.60
, time
Weight: 0.59
Siblings senior
Weight: 0.55
, welterweight
Weight: 0.47
, brigade
Weight: 0.46
, sympathetic nervous system
Weight: 0.46

Related properties

Property Similarity
be opposite of multiplication 1.00
come before multiplication 0.91
be harder than multiplication 0.87
be slower than multiplication 0.86
be expressed as multiplication 0.86
be much harder than multiplication 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(division, be opposite of multiplication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(division, be opposite of multiplication)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(division, be opposite of multiplication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(division, come before multiplication)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(division, be opposite of multiplication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(division, be slower than multiplication)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(division, be opposite of multiplication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(division, be harder than multiplication)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(division, be opposite of multiplication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(division, be expressed as multiplication)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(division, be opposite of multiplication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(division, be much harder than multiplication)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(division, be opposite of multiplication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(division, come before multiplication)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(division, be opposite of multiplication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(division, come before multiplication)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(division, be opposite of multiplication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(division, be expressed as multiplication)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(division, be opposite of multiplication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(division, be slower than multiplication)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(division, be opposite of multiplication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(division, be slower than multiplication)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(division, be opposite of multiplication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(division, come before multiplication)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(division, be opposite of multiplication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(division, be expressed as multiplication)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(division, be opposite of multiplication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(division, be slower than multiplication)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(division, be opposite of multiplication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(division, be expressed as multiplication)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(division, be opposite of multiplication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(division, be harder than multiplication)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(division, be opposite of multiplication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(division, be harder than multiplication)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(division, be opposite of multiplication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(division, be much harder than multiplication)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(division, be opposite of multiplication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(division, be harder than multiplication)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(division, be opposite of multiplication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(division, be much harder than multiplication)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(division, be opposite of multiplication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(division, be much harder than multiplication)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(division, be opposite of multiplication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(division, be opposite of multiplication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(division, be opposite of multiplication)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(division, be opposite of multiplication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(division, be opposite of multiplication)