dna: be more popular than rna

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents macromolecule
Weight: 0.65
, molecule
Weight: 0.61
, nucleic acid
Weight: 0.61
, evidence
Weight: 0.59
, system
Weight: 0.58
Siblings dna molecule
Weight: 0.39
, dna polymerase
Weight: 0.37
, virion
Weight: 0.34
, amino acid
Weight: 0.33
, fingerprint
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more popular than rna 1.00
be better than rna 0.84
be different than rna 0.83
be more stable than rna 0.83
be longer than rna 0.80
be stronger than rna 0.80
be less reactive than rna 0.79
be more favorable than rna 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(dna, be more popular than rna)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(dna molecule, be more stable than rna)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(dna, be more popular than rna)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(dna molecule, be more stable than rna)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(dna molecule, be more stable than rna)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(dna, be more popular than rna)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(dna, be more popular than rna)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(dna, be more popular than rna)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(dna, be better than rna)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(dna, be more popular than rna)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(dna, be different than rna)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(dna, be more popular than rna)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(dna, be more stable than rna)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(dna, be more popular than rna)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(dna, be better than rna)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(dna, be more popular than rna)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(dna, be better than rna)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(dna, be more popular than rna)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(dna, be different than rna)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(dna, be more popular than rna)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(dna, be different than rna)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(dna, be more popular than rna)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(dna, be more stable than rna)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(dna, be more popular than rna)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(dna, be longer than rna)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(dna, be more popular than rna)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(dna, be stronger than rna)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(dna, be more popular than rna)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(dna, be more favorable than rna)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(dna, be more popular than rna)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(dna, be less reactive than rna)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(dna, be more popular than rna)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(dna, be more stable than rna)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(dna, be more popular than rna)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(dna, be stronger than rna)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(dna, be more popular than rna)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(dna, be longer than rna)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(dna, be more popular than rna)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(dna, be more favorable than rna)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(dna, be more popular than rna)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(dna, be less reactive than rna)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(dna, be more popular than rna)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(dna, be stronger than rna)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(dna, be more popular than rna)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(dna, be more favorable than rna)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(dna, be more popular than rna)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(dna, be longer than rna)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(dna, be more popular than rna)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(dna, be less reactive than rna)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(dna, be more popular than rna)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(dna, be more stable than rna)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(dna, be more popular than rna)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(dna, be stronger than rna)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(dna, be more popular than rna)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(dna, be longer than rna)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(dna, be more popular than rna)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(dna, be less reactive than rna)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(dna, be more popular than rna)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(dna, be more favorable than rna)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(dna, be more popular than rna)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(dna, be better than rna)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(dna, be more popular than rna)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(dna, be different than rna)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(dna, be more popular than rna)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(dna, be more popular than rna)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(dna, be more popular than rna)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(dna, be more popular than rna)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(dna, be more popular than rna)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(dna, be more popular than rna)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(dna molecule, be more stable than rna)