dog poop: be soft at end

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.63
, problem
Weight: 0.56
Siblings poop
Weight: 0.37
, dog food
Weight: 0.37
, puppy
Weight: 0.36
, beagle
Weight: 0.35
, animal fat
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be soft at end 1.00
is soft 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(dog poop, be soft at end)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(puppy, is soft)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(dog poop, be soft at end)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(poop, is soft)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(dog poop, be soft at end)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(poop, is soft)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(poop, is soft)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(dog poop, be soft at end)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(puppy, is soft)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(puppy, is soft)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(dog poop, be soft at end)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(dog poop, be soft at end)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(dog poop, be soft at end)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(dog poop, is soft)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(dog poop, be soft at end)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(dog poop, is soft)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(dog poop, be soft at end)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(dog poop, is soft)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(dog poop, be soft at end)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(dog poop, is soft)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(dog poop, be soft at end)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(dog poop, be soft at end)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(dog poop, be soft at end)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(dog poop, be soft at end)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(dog poop, be soft at end)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(dog poop, be soft at end)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(poop, is soft)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(dog poop, be soft at end)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(puppy, is soft)