:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(dog, bark at door)
⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(beagle, bark)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(dog, bark at door)
⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(dachshund, bark)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, bark at door)
⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(beagle, bark)
⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(beagle, bark)
Salient implies Plausible
Similarity expansion
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(dog, bark at door)
⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, bark)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, bark at door)
⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, bark)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(dog, bark at door)
⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(dog, bark)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(dog, bark at door)
⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(dog, bark)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(dog, bark at door)
⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(dachshund, bark)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(dog, bark at door)
⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(beagle, bark)