dog: be at backyard

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents pet food
Weight: 0.73
, wild animal
Weight: 0.71
, mammal
Weight: 0.70
, pet
Weight: 0.69
Siblings beagle
Weight: 0.83
, small dog
Weight: 0.81
, labrador retriever
Weight: 0.81
, cocker spaniel
Weight: 0.80
, police dog
Weight: 0.76

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at backyard 1.00
be at your neighbor yard 0.79
be at porch 0.78
be at home with small yard 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(dog, be at backyard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(small dog, be at backyard)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(dog, be at backyard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(small dog, be at home with small yard)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(dog, be at backyard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(small dog, be at backyard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(small dog, be at backyard)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(dog, be at backyard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(small dog, be at home with small yard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(small dog, be at home with small yard)

Salient implies Plausible

0.11
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(dog, be at backyard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(dog, be at backyard)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(dog, be at backyard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(dog, be at porch)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(dog, be at backyard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(dog, be at porch)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(dog, be at backyard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(dog, be at porch)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(dog, be at backyard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(dog, be at porch)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(dog, be at backyard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(dog, be at backyard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(dog, be at backyard)

Typical implies Plausible

0.09
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(dog, be at backyard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(dog, be at backyard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(dog, be at backyard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(small dog, be at backyard)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(dog, be at backyard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(small dog, be at home with small yard)