dog: has physical part eyes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mammal
Weight: 0.70
, pet
Weight: 0.69
Siblings beagle
Weight: 0.83
, small dog
Weight: 0.81
, labrador retriever
Weight: 0.81
, cocker spaniel
Weight: 0.80
, dachshund
Weight: 0.77

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part eyes 1.00
has eyes 0.90
have big eyes 0.86
have different eyes 0.86
be around eyes 0.85
have black eyes 0.84
look people in eyes 0.84
have massive eyes 0.83
look person in eyes 0.83
have red eyes 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, has physical part eyes)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(cocker spaniel, have red eyes)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(beagle, has physical part eyes)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(beagle, have red eyes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(cocker spaniel, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(cocker spaniel, has physical part eyes)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(beagle, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(beagle, has physical part eyes)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(cocker spaniel, have red eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(cocker spaniel, have red eyes)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(beagle, have red eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(beagle, have red eyes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(dog, has physical part eyes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(dog, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has physical part eyes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has physical part eyes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(cocker spaniel, has physical part eyes)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(beagle, has physical part eyes)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(cocker spaniel, have red eyes)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(beagle, have red eyes)