dog: has physical part tails

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents pet food
Weight: 0.73
, mammal
Weight: 0.70
, pet
Weight: 0.69
Siblings beagle
Weight: 0.83
, small dog
Weight: 0.81
, labrador retriever
Weight: 0.81
, cocker spaniel
Weight: 0.80
, dachshund
Weight: 0.77

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part tails 1.00
has physical part tail 0.89
has physical part claws 0.83
has physical part whiskers 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(mammal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has physical part tails)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pet, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has physical part tails)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(pet, has physical part whiskers)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(pet, has physical part whiskers)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(mammal, has physical part tails)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(dachshund, has physical part whiskers)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(mammal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(dog, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, has physical part tails)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pet, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(dog, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, has physical part tails)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(dachshund, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(dachshund, has physical part whiskers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(dog, has physical part tails)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(dog, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(dog, has physical part whiskers)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, has physical part whiskers)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(dog, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has physical part whiskers)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(dog, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has physical part whiskers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(dog, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has physical part tails)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has physical part tails)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(pet, has physical part whiskers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(dachshund, has physical part whiskers)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(dog, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(dog, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(pet, has physical part whiskers)