dog: pant

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents pet food
Weight: 0.73
, mammal
Weight: 0.70
, pet
Weight: 0.69
Siblings beagle
Weight: 0.83
, small dog
Weight: 0.81
, labrador retriever
Weight: 0.81
, cocker spaniel
Weight: 0.80
, dachshund
Weight: 0.77

Related properties

Property Similarity
pant 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, pant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(beagle, pant)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, pant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(beagle, pant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(beagle, pant)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, pant) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(dog, pant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(dog, pant) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, pant) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, pant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, pant) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, pant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, pant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(beagle, pant)