dolphin: be in danger

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.78
, mammal
Weight: 0.75
, animal
Weight: 0.67
, species
Weight: 0.67
Siblings sperm whale
Weight: 0.74
, whale shark
Weight: 0.72
, blue whale
Weight: 0.63
, orca
Weight: 0.58
, pilot whale
Weight: 0.55

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in danger 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(dolphin, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(orca, be in danger)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(dolphin, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sperm whale, be in danger)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(dolphin, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(blue whale, be in danger)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(dolphin, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(blue whale, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(blue whale, be in danger)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(dolphin, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(orca, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(orca, be in danger)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(dolphin, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(sperm whale, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(sperm whale, be in danger)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(dolphin, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(dolphin, be in danger)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(dolphin, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(dolphin, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(dolphin, be in danger)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(dolphin, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(dolphin, be in danger)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(dolphin, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(blue whale, be in danger)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(dolphin, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(orca, be in danger)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(dolphin, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(sperm whale, be in danger)