domain name: is more expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents name
Weight: 0.85
, domain
Weight: 0.76
, web site
Weight: 0.71
, address
Weight: 0.70
Siblings organization
Weight: 0.63
, dot
Weight: 0.54
, prefix
Weight: 0.36
, alias
Weight: 0.36
, username
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is more expensive 1.00
is expensive 0.94
cost more than others 0.85
be more expensive than holo 0.82
need more money 0.80
be more expensive than reflex 0.79
cost money 0.77
is most important 0.76
changing cost money time 0.76
changing cost money first time 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(domain, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(domain name, is more expensive)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(domain, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(domain name, is more expensive)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(domain, cost money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(domain name, is more expensive)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(name, is most important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(domain name, is more expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(domain name, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(domain, is more expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(domain name, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(domain, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(domain name, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(name, is most important)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(domain name, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(domain, cost money)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(domain name, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(domain, is more expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(domain name, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(domain, is expensive)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(domain name, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(domain, cost money)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(domain name, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(name, is most important)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(domain name, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(dot, be more expensive than holo)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(domain name, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(dot, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(domain name, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(dot, be more expensive than reflex)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(domain name, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(organization, need more money)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(domain, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(domain name, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(domain name, is more expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(domain, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(domain name, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(domain name, is more expensive)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(domain, cost money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(domain name, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(domain name, is more expensive)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(name, is most important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(domain name, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(domain name, is more expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(domain name, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(dot, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(dot, is expensive)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(domain name, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(dot, be more expensive than holo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(dot, be more expensive than holo)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(domain name, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(organization, need more money) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(organization, need more money)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(domain name, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(dot, be more expensive than reflex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(dot, be more expensive than reflex)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(domain name, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(domain name, is more expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(domain name, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(domain name, is expensive)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(domain name, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(domain name, is expensive)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(domain name, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(domain name, is expensive)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(domain name, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(domain name, cost more than others)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(domain name, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(domain name, cost more than others)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(domain name, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(domain name, cost more than others)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(domain name, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(domain name, cost money)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(domain name, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(domain name, cost money)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(domain name, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(domain name, cost money)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(domain name, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(domain name, is expensive)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(domain name, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(domain name, cost more than others)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(domain name, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(domain name, cost money)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(domain name, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(domain name, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(domain name, is more expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(domain name, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(domain name, is more expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(domain name, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(name, is most important)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(domain name, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(domain, is more expensive)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(domain name, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(domain, cost money)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(domain name, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(domain, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(domain name, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(dot, be more expensive than holo)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(domain name, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(dot, be more expensive than reflex)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(domain name, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(organization, need more money)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(domain name, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(dot, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(domain name, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(domain, is more expensive)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(domain name, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(domain, is expensive)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(domain name, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(name, is most important)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(domain name, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(domain, cost money)