donations: have deductible tax

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents service
Weight: 0.37
Siblings homeless shelter
Weight: 0.28
, escort service
Weight: 0.28
, postal service
Weight: 0.27
, reimbursement
Weight: 0.27
, service station
Weight: 0.27

Related properties

Property Similarity
have deductible tax 1.00
have tax 0.84
reducing income tax 0.82
affect business taxes 0.78
is taxed 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(donations, have deductible tax)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(reimbursement, is taxed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(donations, have deductible tax)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(reimbursement, is taxed)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(reimbursement, is taxed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(donations, have deductible tax)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(donations, have deductible tax)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(donations, have deductible tax)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(donations, have tax)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(donations, have deductible tax)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(donations, reducing income tax)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(donations, have deductible tax)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(donations, reducing income tax)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(donations, have deductible tax)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(donations, reducing income tax)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(donations, have deductible tax)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(donations, have tax)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(donations, have deductible tax)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(donations, have tax)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(donations, have deductible tax)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(donations, is taxed)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(donations, have deductible tax)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(donations, is taxed)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(donations, have deductible tax)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(donations, is taxed)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(donations, have deductible tax)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(donations, have tax)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(donations, have deductible tax)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(donations, reducing income tax)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(donations, have deductible tax)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(donations, affect business taxes)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(donations, have deductible tax)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(donations, affect business taxes)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(donations, have deductible tax)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(donations, is taxed)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(donations, have deductible tax)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(donations, affect business taxes)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(donations, have deductible tax)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(donations, affect business taxes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(donations, have deductible tax)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(donations, have deductible tax)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(donations, have deductible tax)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(donations, have deductible tax)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(donations, have deductible tax)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(donations, have deductible tax)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(reimbursement, is taxed)