donkey: chew on wood

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents horse
Weight: 0.68
, animal
Weight: 0.65
, creature
Weight: 0.60
, equine
Weight: 0.55
Siblings llama
Weight: 0.37
, goat
Weight: 0.36
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.36
, guinea pig
Weight: 0.36
, reindeer
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
chew on wood 1.00
eat wood 0.91
chew on trees 0.89
eat bark 0.83
eat tree bark 0.80
eat cardboard 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(horse, eat tree bark)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(donkey, chew on wood)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(donkey, chew on wood)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(horse, eat tree bark)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(donkey, chew on wood)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(horse, eat tree bark)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(horse, eat tree bark)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(donkey, chew on wood)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(donkey, chew on wood)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(donkey, chew on wood)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(donkey, chew on wood)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(donkey, chew on wood)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(donkey, eat wood)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(donkey, chew on wood)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(donkey, eat wood)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(donkey, chew on wood)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(donkey, eat wood)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(donkey, chew on wood)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(donkey, eat wood)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(donkey, chew on wood)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(donkey, chew on trees)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(donkey, chew on wood)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(donkey, chew on trees)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(donkey, chew on wood)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(donkey, chew on trees)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(donkey, chew on wood)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(donkey, chew on trees)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(donkey, chew on wood)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(donkey, chew on wood)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(donkey, chew on wood)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(donkey, chew on wood)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(donkey, chew on wood)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(donkey, chew on wood)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(horse, eat tree bark)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(donkey, chew on wood)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(horse, eat tree bark)